(i) Democracy evolves through struggle by the people of the country, which could be in the form of strikes, dharnas , bandhs and demonstrations. These are good only if they promote interests, benefits and democratic ideals of the masses, when the government ends up ignoring them. Such activities mean that the democracy is expanding and deepening its roots.
(ii) It is not only our country where these happen. It happens in every democratic country when the general will of the people is ignored.
(i) No mobilizing a bigger crowd does not let any side have what it wants. It is not simply mobilizing. People cannot be mobilized as objects. In fact, it is rooted in the common interest of the people. It is the common and genuine interest of the people that has the force of mobilizing the mass. The force of struggle in the people for a common cause cannot originate at the will of any group, it is spontaneous.
(ii) No, we can say it in other words that people’s will and interest has might and it is through this that a democracy evolves.
(i) A Local Farmer :
Land for grazing our cattle will be effected because of Eucalyptus plantations as it does not allow other plants to grow. So, this must not be permitted.
(ii) An Environmental Activist :
Eucalyptus plantation makes the land barren as it grows very fast at the cost of underground water.. Not only this, they will affect the growth of smaller plants under them. So, it should not be permitted.
(iii) A Government Official:
I do not know whether this plantation has negative or positive effect. Being a government servant, I have to comply with my duty and continue with planting eucalyptus.
(iv) A Consumer of Paper :
As soon as paper company start producing pulp and paper and supply them at a cheaper rate due to reduction in the cost of transportation.
The following are the reasons for not able to alleviate poverty from India are:
Corruption is very much found at each and every level of the administrative system. It never let the money of the project/scheme to reach the place or people for which is allocated. Rajiv Gandhi once quoted that whatever we sent from the centre, only 15 to 20 per cent of the money reached to the largest group or place. Other reasons are illiteracy and devoid of awareness in the people regarding their rights and duties specially right to information.
Social Auditing concepts like people taking initiative and check the accounts and quality of the work, then all the officials and contractors will be afraid from taking wrong decisions. Our constitution has given us the right to ask or enquire about any project or activities going on in the area by the fund supplied by the government.
(i) The pressure groups given in the news clippings given here are - AITUC, NGO, CII, RWAs, journalists and Delhi’s traders.
(ii) These pressure groups are making the following demands:
AITUS is making demand for Pro- American tilt in foreign policy.
NGOs –These organisations are demanding the standard drugs to be supplied to Bhopal gas victims, Because these victims are getting sub-standard drugs.
CII- It is demanding for the establishment of SEZs (special Economic Zones) for the growth in the job sector.
RWAs- They are making demand that their side of the story should be heard too.
Journalists – They are protesting against assault on photographer. So, they are demanding action against those who assaulted photographer.
Delhi Traders – They are demanding the assurance of timely refund of VAT dues to Delhi’s traders.
No, Bureaucrats are government officials they always try to protect the government actions from not being into public.
In the cartoon, the head of the government the PM is shown inaugurating the Right to information law. A person is shown trying to make this law applicable to the general public, but the bureaucratic hurdles don’t let it reach to the people.
(i) The social movements listed in the news clippings given above are – social audit of government account, RTI activist’s movement for fair play in PDS, M.P. tribal’s seek their right on forest land, KSSP for ADB loans and social audit of government account.
(ii) The organizations mentioned above are making the following efforts to mobilize a particular section:
Social Organisations are making effort to check the account and other activities to uncover irregularities in Rajasthan. They are mobilizing the general public to come out and take this responsibility.
RTI activists are making efforts to raise the issue of muscle and money power in ruling the PDS. RTI activists are trying to mobilise the poor section of the society who are not getting their due from the PDS system.
M.P. Tribals – are making efforts to seek full right on forest land and are also opposing displacement from the area. They are mobilizing the tribal people to come out and take initiative for their birth right on forest land.
KSSP- is putting pressure on the bank officials to follow transparency in the distribution of ADB loans.
(i) Traders, women and industry are mostly mentioned on television.
(ii) Environment, farmer and labour get mentioned the least on television.
(i) Social movements are carried by the agitated people against the wrong practices and ill policies of the government. In the above passage, while Mr. Mathai was encouraging farmers to plant trees on lands, the government sold the piece of land to its supporters. To prevent undemocratic situations like this people started agitation against government.
(ii) The movement should oppose the working of the government officials. It should forward its demand before the government till justice is met with.
(i) The following are most often visible in the media:
Political leaders, ministers, businessmen, industrialists, traders, sportsmen, film actors/actresses, etc.
(ii) In newspapers, we hear most likely about the following:
Women activists, social workers, environmentalists, etc.
Pressure groups exert influence on politics in different ways like they start to campaign on public issue. With the help of media they draw attention of public. They generally call for strike and dharnas to raise their demands or voice. But unlike the interest groups, movements have a loose organization. Their decision making is more informal and flexible.
There are two types of relationship between pressure groups and political parties. In a direct relationship, pressure groups act as an extended wing of political parties. In other cases, the relationship between parties and interest or movement groups is indirect. They often take positions that are opposed to each other. Yet they are in dialogue and negotiation. Movement groups have raised new issues that have been taken up by political parties.
Pressure groups provide chance to marginalised groups to voice their opinions. They force the government to make policies which will benefit other sections of the society also.
Sometime rich and powerful put pressure on the government to form a policy or take a decision in their interest. In such situations pressure groups can counter such move by putting pressure on the government to take a decision in the interest of ordinary citizens. To put pressure on the government in public interest is good and it strengthens democracy.
Even sectional interest groups play a valuable role. As there are different sectional groups, no one can achieve dominance over society. If one group brings pressure on government to make policies in its favour, another will bring counter pressure not to make policies in the way the first group desires. Thus, different sectional interest groups help the government to maintain a balance of power and accommodation of conflicting interests.
Pressure groups are organizations that force government through protests, bandhs, and strikes to make policies. These organizations are formed when people with common occupation, interests, aspirations, or opinions come together in order to achieve a common objective.
Examples are – Nepal’s movement for democracy, Narmada Bachao Andolan, Movement for Right to Information, Anti-liquor Movement, Women’s Movement, Environmental Movement.
A pressure groups fight for public interests in indirect way. They influence the government in making decisions which promote its interests. They fight and try to achieve a common objective. They do not take part in competitive politics but try to influence the government by different means. Whereas political parties take direct participation in competitive politics. They contest elections in order to win majority and form government. Their aim is to achieve political power. They have their own ideology and have their own way of achieving their aim.
Answer: Sectional interest<
(a) Parties take political stances, while pressure groups do not bother about political issues.
(b) Pressure groups are confined to a few people, while parties involve larger number of people.
(c) Pressure groups do not seek to get into power, while political parties do.
(d) Pressure groups do not seek to mobilise people, while parties do.
(c) Pressure groups do not seek to get into power, while political parties do.
Answer: (b) C, D, A, B.
Answer: (a) D, C,A, B.
Which of the statements given above are correct ?
(a) A, B and C
(b) A and B
(c) B and C
(d) A and C
Answer: (b) A and B
In the above instance of Mewat, we can infer that movements take up issues which have been ignored by political parties. Political parties may then be influenced by these demands when they frame their own manifestoes. It was a movement that was supported by different organizations viz., Mewat Educational and Social Organisation, Mewat Saksharta Samiti, and Mewat Vikas Sabha. Because of Mewat Vikas Sabha force, two major parties, Congress and the Indian National Lok Dal supported them.
In the Mewat case, the government of the Indian National Lok Dal was in power and it also supported the demand for the new district in view of coming elections in the state. None of the party wanted to go against the demands of the people. As Congress won the election in 2005 and had supported the movement, the new district came into existence in July 2005.
The Asom Gana Parishad, formed out of the AASU (All Assam Students Union), contested and won the elections, forming the Government of Assam. In this example, we see a political party being formed out of a pressure group, which then goes on to form the government.